🎰 Expectations for the Dice Setter

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days πŸ–

Filter:
Sort:
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Answer 1 of Is there such Thing as Dice Control? Can Dice be manipulated? manipulated variable,? controlled variable? here's a nice article about this.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
is dice control possible

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

I've watched Ahigh shoot and he has a real good shot. He has the physical skill already to do what is possible. The hurdle for anyone is mental.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
is dice control possible

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

is whether or not it is possible to influence the throw of the dice in craps. Even the strongest believers in dice control will admit that most.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
is dice control possible

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

This comes from the fact that six out of 36 possible dice combinations form a 7. Any player who can roll fewer sevens than the odds, or %.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
is dice control possible

🎰

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Planning to learn dice control? Think again! This is our view on craps dice control​, you may or may not agree with the content.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
is dice control possible

🎰

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

This comes from the fact that six out of 36 possible dice combinations form a 7. Any player who can roll fewer sevens than the odds, or %.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
is dice control possible

🎰

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

It's not humanly possible. But that is exactly the kind of control a p-shooter would have to have to have any chance of influencing the dice at all.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
is dice control possible

🎰

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

5elements-2014.ru β€Ί games β€Ί craps β€Ί appendix.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
is dice control possible

🎰

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Wong basically said he believed dice control was possible but difficult. He said he now thinks it can only be accomplished by a select few.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
is dice control possible

🎰

Software - MORE
B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

5elements-2014.ru β€Ί games β€Ί craps β€Ί appendix.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
is dice control possible

The good news is that fact and truth does not require someone to believe in it for it to be true. Since that time I have had an email exchange with Bryce, and found that Bryce is firmly on the other side. The more players and hopefully casino personnel that you can convince that dice influencing DI is a myth, the better for those advantage players who are employing it successfully. I have two distinct lives. If you manage to influence a single roll that would've been a 7 you are playing a break even game. She reasoned that in an inelastic collision of a rigid undeformable mass with a non-rigid deformable one all of Newton's momentum or Leibniz's vis viva would be absorbed by the deformable mass, and the degree of deformation would determine who was right. If you are right, and your results show it, let those who doubt DI enjoy their attempts at explaining it away. The thesis of this book is that players can control the dice when they throw them and have 7 show up less than 1 in 6 times. No mechanical device can simulate the actual dice toss of a skilled shooter. Leibniz replied that, like everything else, it came by the power of God, and if Newton doubted that perhaps he should take it up with the Pope, or maybe the Archbishop of Canterbury. Lots of practice and practical experience at the tables can teach a Dice Influence shooter how to adjust for just about any sort of conditions. This would be to say that a baseball pitching machine could replace a legionary pitcher, and that is simply not so. If a player could do this it would be worth a fortune. Believe in DI? But Newton didn't believe in energy, kinetic or otherwise. But Newton, perhaps the greatest genius of all time, had a bitter rival of almost equal genius. We are talking about daily play either live at the casinos or at home on a casino grade table to develop the DI skills. Keep rattling and shaking 'em and slinging them down the table. All of this the shooter needs to account for when tossing the dice for effect. For my two cents I'd like to add that every throw we take affects the outcome of the dice, good or bad. Now, because simulations of precision shooting at casino craps are not feasible, these researchers have generally utilized carefully monitored casino sessions of statistically significant duration with recognized "professional" p-shooters, as well as slow-motion videos of such experts throwing the dice on regulation craps tables, to obtain valid useful data. This only ambiguously disproves some irrelevant hypothesis. But he wasn't, and there isn't. And that was it. Monday, December 12, Dice Control - Not. Sometimes, the Gods really do have a twisted sense of humor. Dice Influence alone is not enough to beat Craps. All of the Dice Clubs that teach Dice Influence are careful to set expectations and tell those who attend that it takes years of practical play and experience to really get anywhere with the skill. But, regardless of motive, all of them have diligently searched for the truth. So, Newton reasoned that when an outside force acted on a body at rest to create motion it had to impart an "impetus" to the body which overcame the body's inherent inertia. This force imparted an impetus, P, sufficient to move a mass, m, to a velocity, v. But in those that amp, small differences in initial conditions grow large over time. Then, using Newton's gravity equations, she dropped the ball from a greater height, such that the velocity at impact was calculated to be exactly twice the velocity of the first drop, and, again, measured the depth of the depression left by the ball. Most craps players simply lose due to poor betting and play methods. This is clearly true after we have thrown the dice There are physical laws in whihc the dice abide by the dice dont change properties int he air on every throw. Poor Leibniz, he had waited a lifetime to beat Newton at something important, and when he finally did he wasn't alive to enjoy it. In blackjack craps poker there is still a gamble Sure you can win in poker when you play inexperienced players but when you come across someone with a higher skill set than you We'll the house edge isn't in your favor anymore Setting the dice and tossing them on-axis does de-randomize the dice to a degree that when combined with the right betting method does give an slight advantage to the player. Everyone ends up happy. Virtually without exception, with the monitored "professional" p-shooters the larger the number of trials the more random the results appear with each die face converging on a random frequency of 1 in 6.{/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} For him there was no such thing! Set the dice and toss them. If the naysayers are right, and DI is not possible, then you still have a "random" game, so you've lost nothing by attempting DI. One in the trenches of low-budget film and television, the other in professional gambling. The results of such studies have been telling. A few weeks ago we had Stanford Wong on the show talking about his book Wong on Dice. And because kinetic energy is an exponential function of the square of velocity, tossing dice at craps is an amping process, whereby small differences in initial conditions result in large differences in the final results. In fact, he sent me the following essay on dice control, and gave me permission to post it here. I whole heartedly agree with Blackriverw. He thought there was more to motion than momentum. Its just like learning a golf swing, you pay for it but if you don't actually put the time and effort in it - it then just won't get you where you want to go. Leibniz had been right all along. His name was Gottfried Leibniz. This was definitely not your everyday wench, royalty or not. Newton knew that unless acted upon by an outside force bodies in motion stayed in motion, and bodies at rest stayed at rest. Processes in nature tend to either damp or amp as they propagate through space and time. They'll even let you short throw more often than that which even the staunchest critics would say is probably possible to influence. Because of the feast-or-famine nature of show business I need a reliable income So here you will read about both worlds. Neither esoteric arguments about Newtonian Physics, nor limited "tests" of rolls, will replace results money in the rack. If you want to play like this, then say goodbye to the hardways, the horns and the hop bets, those are just for the amateurs to get addicted to, think of it like the casino selling you crack - it looks sexy when you win the first time, but in the long run you lose badly. He said there was also a "vis viva" or "life force," proportional to the square of the velocity, that a mass acquires when it's accelerated to a given velocity with respect to another inertial frame. Pages Home About Me. The ability to toss the dice on-axis is not consistent and factors such as the playing conditions, the dice weight and size, the table surface all have its effect on the dice and how much energy will be absorbed or transfer back in to the dice when they hit the table to the back wall. It's important because it says that a small change in velocity results in a large change in kinetic energy, which means that when, say, two dice are thrown simultaneously with only a small difference in initial velocity, the differences in their behavior at impact will be large. Some of these researchers have hoped to show that craps could be beaten, and some have just been intellectually curious. Very large. The cries of voodoo out there about Dice Influence tends to come from those who don't have the patience or the time put in to this skill and exhibit buyers remorse about what they may have spent to learn the skill. So, she decided to set up an experiment to settle the matter once and for all. But, if the second depression were four times as deep as the first one, then Leibniz would be right. The airtight logic is proffered in a fashion that leaves no room for rational debate. Newton countered by mocking the whole idea of a putative so-called "life force" as superstitious nonsense, and sarcastically asked Leibniz if perhaps the laying on of hands were necessary to impart this special force to masses, and, if so, did it come by the power of God or perhaps Beelzebub. I aim for the margin at the bottom of the back wall, so that it follows the letter of the rule without actually hitting the pyramids. Post a Comment. That player is a man named KC, and he will be our guest this week. And therein lies a fascinating tale that is worth a little trip down history lane. You see, at its core, the potential to beat craps comes down to the nature of kinetic energy. We can leave that wrangling to the dusty annals of history thanks to Mssrs. By all means, please continue to argue against the feasibility of influencing the dice, even occasionally which is all it takes to gain an advantage. For Newton, there was mass and there was motion. I think I can keep the dice on axis one time in ! The proof can only be truly measured by the results, and no serious player is going to get on here and brag about his or her success with DI. And that was all there was to it. Don't "believe in" DI? Newton and Leibnitz. In those that damp, small differences in initial conditions become even smaller over time. When I read Wong's book he had some quotes from Bryce Carlson that lead me to believe that Bryce was a believer in dice control. Now, over the last five years a number of serious, legitimate researchers, including Stanford Wong, myself and others, have sought to determine the truth about so-called AP craps. Bryce is the author of Blackjack For Blood , and very well respected in the advantage play community. Leibniz would be proud. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}An extraordinarily well-crafted disquisition by the redoubtable author of Backgammon for Blood and Blackjack for Blood. It is either true, or it isn't, in and of itself. And Leibniz had a different idea. Okay, so why is it so important that Newton was wrong and Leibniz was right? Sure you won't be a millionaire because that isn't the point. Structured play and using regressions is the only means for professional craps players means to beat the game.